Inkipedia:Featured content

Featured articles are select pages that are shown on the main page. These should be articles with few to no major flaws, being complete, comprehensive, well-written, and accompanied by relevant media.

Nomination process
Featured articles can be proposed in the below section, where they can be voted on once by each user. Nominations may stay up for up to five voting periods before they are removed. An article may not be featured more than once a year.

On the first day of every even-numbered month, the article with the highest difference of those in favor minus those who oppose will be featured. Two articles will be featured at any time, comprising of the winners of the previous two voting periods.

Nominations can be made in the following format:

Turf War
Nominated by Nyargleblargle

Oppose

 * 1) Slight oppose in current state. Has a good amount of information, but it could use some cleanup, better wording, a more natural flow, and some updating with new stuff. The last major edit was in September! D: The associated gallery is a bit sparse as well. --Bzeep!  talk  19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose in current state. Lots of crowded text. outdated pic of camp for infobox and gallery and green particles at the gif in gallery. Not enough pictures for a big mode such as Turf War. 19:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Weapon Brand
Nominated by Shachar700

Support

 * 1) Weak support 22:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Weak support. It's definitely coming along! Has a lot of good info and the logos all look nice. We still have to work on in-game instances of the brands and some wording, though, as per the comments. --Bzeep!  talk  19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments
I like how I'm an example for a nomination format. :P We need image to summarize weapon brand if this gets selected. 19:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It shows the username of whoever is reading the page. Anyway, as for the article itself, I like it, though it could stand to be a bit more concise. 22:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * As the main contributor to that article, I agree. It is a bit all over the place in the sections. English is not my first language either, so I suspect some parts contain wonky formatting or wording 10:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Squid Sisters
Nominated by Lukey140701

Support

 * 1) Support. It's complete without being too wordy and has a very appealing look to it, even if the gallery is getting a little big. --Bzeep!  talk  19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Weak oppose. The trivia section is extremely large and some of the page is written a bit unprofessionally. 17:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)