Inkipedia talk:Policy/Consensus

There are still a number of issues that the draft does not address: 13:59, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) The majority of a group (i.e. Inkipedia's active editors) -- if the active editing community don't see or interact with the discussion, are we to say motion passed given the arguments put forward by the proposer?
 * 2) The dispute should be analyzed in an unbiased fashion -- by who? Do admins/bcrats have the final say? Is this still democratic?
 * 3) Where should the voting take place? (May be out-of-scope for this policy)
 * 4) Add that beginning another discussion should link to previous discussions (if any)
 * 5) Links to Request for Rights page and MOS should be fixed.
 * 6) I would argue moving/splitting/merging generally does not require consensus, unless it is a well-established or high-traffic article (such as Splatfest). Correction of an article name, especially unreleased items, should fall under the just do it category.
 * Yes, but we should keep the discussion open for longer just in case. Will put that in later.
 * It's not supposed to pure democracy. The Admins and Bcrats do have the final say (albeit not if it clearly goes against consensus).
 * Same place as always, talk page. That said, yes, it's out of scope.
 * If it's on the same page, not needed IMO.
 * Done.
 * Will note corrections are an exception.
 * I probably won't be back until early tomorrow or late tonight, so if anyone objects to the changes, please chip in.
 * 14:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Better now? 19:36, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

I agree with this. -- R alts eye prata med mej 17:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)