User talk:AlexD830

Welcome to Inkipedia, AlexD830!

We're glad you decided to create an account and join us at the free, editable encyclopedia all about the Splatoon series! You are now able to edit pages, join discussions, and expand our coverage of the game. Here are some things to keep in mind while editing: Again, welcome, and we're glad you're joining us! Sincerely, 05:07, 13 June 2019 (UTC) .
 * Create your user page, your own personal space to introduce yourself!
 * The Ink Pump is the place to discuss wiki-wide things, including ideas, proposals, and questions.
 * Come join us on Discord to chat or play Splatoon!
 * Sign any comments you make on discussion or talk pages using four tildes.
 * Visit the Recent Changes to see all the latest edits.
 * If you need help using and editing the wiki, MediaWiki Help is a good place to start.
 * If you ever have any questions, don't hesitate to ask any other editors or staff members - they don't bite!

Custom Explosher question
Why are you claiming on the T-tek, Ballpoint Nouveau, Ink Storm, and Inkjet pages, that the Custom Explosher has 230p when it doesn't? Also, why are you changing the Special Weapon trivia about which weapons have the least and most points? They are fine just the way they are. P.J. GT (talk) 02:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Recommended Abilities
Thank you for contributing to the wiki! Unfortunately, these recommended abilities sections were discussed before as not appropriate in the specific weapon's aticles due to them being subjective, differs in playstyle or meta dependant. We've left some external links in the Abilities page for readers to look for gear loadouts or ability effectiveness. We'd like upon agreement to remove those sections. If you have any questions, you are welcome to discuss with us on Ink Pump or Discord. 22:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Dear AlexD830, the recommended abilities you've added recently do not fit the main space as the reasons I stated above. They also do not have grounds to them as no source or reference has been given. We've started to move the recommended abilities sections to their own competitive space (See Splattershot Jr. and Competitive:Splattershot Jr. for example). Please follow the guidelines I've adressed and if you have any questions let me know. If the offense continues, a temporary block would be applied. 21:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Your recent changes.
I reverted your edit on the Areo RG again because its completely unnecessary. I've reported you to Shahar. Please stop. P.J. GT (talk) 22:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Random trivia facts
The trivia policy that recently got passed mentions that the trivia section should not be a place to dump random facts and occurrences that occur. It should be something worth noting. Please do not re-add something that was revoked as it was given a reasonable explanation why it shouldn't be included. This is your first warning. 18:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Using 3rd person and being more formal while editing
Hello, I have noticed your recent contributions have been written in 1st person. Please make sure to write in 3rd person while editing. Also, make sure to be more formal while editing pages. Sentences such as "If they do manage to splat you, you'll respawn way more quickly." can be written better as "Even if the player is splatted, they will respawn very quickly." Thanks! 04:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Your edit war on Tacticooler
Hello AlexD380, I have reverted your edits on Tacticooler multiple times because Ink armor is not related to the special. Yes, they both affect the entire team, but not always for Tacticooler. Sometimes only 2 people will grab the drink, or sometimes 3. Additionally, the specials are in two separate games, making it irrelevant. The effects are completely different as well. Please note that edit warring is not allowed on Inkipedia, and may result in a block if it goes further. Thank you. 22:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Tapping in here. Instead of going back and forth edits on the matter for Tacticooler, I would suggest discussing the matter of specials on the talk page (or your user talk page right here!) instead. That way, a longer, more concise understanding of the positions being taken be observed and a conclusion can be made, instead of participating in the exchange of edits. It is clear that some of the information you have provided is contested for accuracy, and trying to understand why it is or isn't going to work for the page is important. Thanks! Trig - 04:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)