Inkipedia:Featured content/Archives/1

Squid Sisters
Nominated by Lukey140701

Support

 * 1) Support. It's complete without being too wordy and has a very appealing look to it, even if the gallery is getting a little big. --Bzeep!  talk  19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. The Squid Sisters are an important part of the game, and this page covers them very well. I don't think that the gallery is too big, and I personally like a lot of triva. And if people want to know more about either Callie or Marie, they each have their individual pages so that their group page isn't ridiculously big. Skylar (talk) 21:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Support I've been checking the article many times for reference and it has never failed to give me the proper information. I think the article is alright. Sometimes, lots of trivia and a big gallery don't mean an article is badly written. (sorry for my English.) 10:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 4) Support The Squid Sisters are one of the main characters in the game, and this page is very well done. 14:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Weak oppose. The trivia section is extremely large and some of the page is written a bit unprofessionally. 17:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Easter Eggs
Nominated by Skylar

Oppose

 * 1) Not a lot written on most of these. 01:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) The page doesn't seem good enough to be a featured article, it needs more details! 14:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Gonna have to go with slight oppose as it is now. What is has isn't too bad, but it could be more in-depth and its formatting can be improved. --Bzeep!  talk  02:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments
I just thought this would be interesting. They aren't glitches or hacks, but just fun things to do. I love how Nintendo adds little things like these to their games, these are what makes games awesome! Skylar (talk) 21:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah! This can be a great article with some work. 👍 --Bzeep!  talk  02:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Can I get rid of this nomination now? It was a while ago and now I see that its not really a good page... 21:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Splatoon (manga)
Nominated by GogglesKunInkling

Support

 * 1) Strong Support. I'm a HUGE fan of the manga!!! 11:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Strong Support! I now think that is will be good on the front page as it is interesting and different from just normal Splatoon. Also the manga itself is awesome! Read it if you haven't already! 13:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Oppose
Whatever you guys think it is, you admins are the Judd-ges! (get it?) 11:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC) Slight oppose. I don't hate it, but the page needs to be improved for it to be on the main page. Plus, it's not even mentioned in Splatoon so, well it just can't be on there :( 16:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC) I have improved some! You should check it out or something. Second of all, you can read some of the manga. There will be proof that it can be mentioned in Splatoon. Come on, bra, let it be main! Fan of your Corocoro manga.... GogglesKunInkling! (talk)
 * 1) Oppose because of how new it is. It's definitely got potential! However, it needs a lot more info and the Rider page should probably be combined with it. --Bzeep!  talk  02:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Strong oppose. Doesn't even discuss the plot. 02:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I Wow. Do you even read the "Plot" of Splatoon (manga)?
 * That was added after I added my opinion. Still, I don't feel the article is very complete. 17:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose. It still needs a lot of work in various areas to be considered featured article-worthy.

Comments
The manga makes the world of Splatoon even more intresting. It uses the Splatoon rules and world, and all those things. Goggles is hilarious, but Knit Cap seems even more popular (I think it's due to the fact that her trait is Cutey). This manga is CoroCoro realated. Just wanna point it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GogglesKunInkling (talk • contribs)

Now that the article has been improved and expanded, and that I have read the manga, I think that it is definitely good enough to be on the front page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr squid (talk • contribs)

Turf War
Nominated by Nyargleblargle

Support

 * 1) Slight Support as this page is pretty good and is one of the main stages. However there are a few things that need to be improved (in particular its gallery). 19:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Slight support as well, the updates have gotten it up to par. I agree about the gallery though, it's still sort of limited. --Bzeep!  talk  02:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Slight support. The gallery still need some love to it but I think the article has improved. 03:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 4) Support. I nominated it in the first place, and it's well-written and comprehensive. 17:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Slight oppose in current state. Has a good amount of information, but it could use some cleanup, better wording, a more natural flow, and some updating with new stuff. The last major edit was in September! D: The associated gallery is a bit sparse as well. --<font color="#f2992e">Bzeep!   <font color="#f7c282">talk  19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose in current state. Lots of crowded text. outdated pic of camp for infobox and gallery and green particles at the gif in gallery. Not enough pictures for a big mode such as Turf War.  19:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Slight oppose Again, the pre-release image of Camp Triggerfish that was mentioned above. This could be misleading to newer players. I understand that it is from an official Nintendo commercial, but I believe (more) updated images would be better. Skylar (talk) 21:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Weapon Brand
Nominated by Shachar700

Support

 * 1) Weak support 22:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Weak support. It's definitely coming along! Has a lot of good info and the logos all look nice. We still have to work on in-game instances of the brands and some wording, though, as per the comments. --<font face="Corbel"><font color="#f2992e">Bzeep!  <font color="#f7c282">talk  19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments
I like how I'm an example for a nomination format. :P We need image to summarize weapon brand if this gets selected. 19:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It shows the username of whoever is reading the page. Anyway, as for the article itself, I like it, though it could stand to be a bit more concise. 22:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * As the main contributor to that article, I agree. It is a bit all over the place in the sections. English is not my first language either, so I suspect some parts contain wonky formatting or wording 10:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)