Competitive talk:Blaster
From Inkipedia, the Splatoon wiki
Hey! I was just checking out the version history for this page and was wondering if we could revert to the change before that last one (idk if it has a specific name) because the weakness of having no bomb being deleted is subjective, and should probably still be listed. --ππ π ππͺπΎππ£ππ π<γ³:彑 (talk) 14:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Well it is true that Disruptor is good that it makes up for not having a bomb so I think it's good how it is nowΒ :) ChessMaster [TALK] 17:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- But every situation in which you would use a disruptor would be better served by using a bomb that can actually splat someone. Heddy (talk) 00:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe something like "The disruptor sub is helpful in some circumstances, but having no bomb can also be a weakness." would be good.--ππ π ππͺπΎππ£ππ π<γ³:彑 (talk) 14:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- that seems to work! I'll add that ChessMaster [TALK] 14:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe something like "The disruptor sub is helpful in some circumstances, but having no bomb can also be a weakness." would be good.--ππ π ππͺπΎππ£ππ π<γ³:彑 (talk) 14:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- But every situation in which you would use a disruptor would be better served by using a bomb that can actually splat someone. Heddy (talk) 00:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
