User:Mr Squid/6 months on Inkipedia!/I'm not perfect
Barnsquids?
Yes, you are allowed to give others Barnsquids! However, Barnsquids for edit counts and similar landmarks are usually not given; people simply put them on their own userpage if they feel like it. Other Barnsquids, such as the Gold Barnsquid (and any other award Barnsquid) should be given to you by someone else; in that case, these Barnsquids should be left on their talk page.
Sorry if my revisions of your edits came off a bit too harsh! Keep up the great work! :)
-
04:14, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- And one more thing, usually Barnsquids are given to people on their talk pages. I know you're just being nice, but some people might find it rude if someone else changes their user page. :b --Bzeep! talk 12:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Welcomes
Yo you don't need to welcome someone until they've made at least one edit. It's simpler that way, I guess. :y --Bzeep! talk 16:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Welcoming users
Hey, In future, only welcome users who have made at least one contribution, since a lot of people just make an account and never edit. Thanks, 
16:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Trivia point
Hey again, the trivia point which I had initially removed is rather redundant, since more-or-less all dialogue within the game is different between regions. Thanks, 16:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Okay then. Mr Squid (talk) 16:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
INK:TALK
User talk pages should be used to contact a user or provide constructive criticism on their edits. The types of edits you've made to your own user talk page would be better suited towards a user page (for showing off your signature) or a main article's talk page (for making suggestions to improve a page). 
Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 17:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Sorry! I will not do stuff like that 😀 Interestingly, I was reading the policy on talk pages when you sent it!
17:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Rollback
This change to Battle Dojo was an unacceptable usage of rollback. While the change was indeed creating a typo, the user was good faith, so it should have been undone, not rollbacked. Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 18:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Reminder of this with your recent edit to Splattershot Jr. This rollback was arguably an even more blatant violation. You should have undone and explained why you were removing the trivia point. If this behavior continues, your patroller status may be revoked.
Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 15:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry! I thought that rollbacking was just a quicker way of undoing edits. And for the second part, I think I might have accidentally clicked on the weong button! But in the future I will try not to use that tool unless it is really needed. 12:46, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Please don't demote me! :) 13:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- They more or less do the same thing, except that rollback doesn't give you the chance to explain why you are reverting the edit. Unless an edit is obvious vandalism or spam, you should almost always give a reason for undoing an edit. This keeps things clear, doesn't discourage editors as much, and helps prevent arguments and edit wars. ~SuperHamster Talk 17:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Okay then. 17:02, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- They more or less do the same thing, except that rollback doesn't give you the chance to explain why you are reverting the edit. Unless an edit is obvious vandalism or spam, you should almost always give a reason for undoing an edit. This keeps things clear, doesn't discourage editors as much, and helps prevent arguments and edit wars. ~SuperHamster Talk 17:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Please don't demote me! :) 13:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry! I thought that rollbacking was just a quicker way of undoing edits. And for the second part, I think I might have accidentally clicked on the weong button! But in the future I will try not to use that tool unless it is really needed. 12:46, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
