Talk:Rumors and leaks

From Inkipedia, the Splatoon wiki
Revision as of 03:32, 22 June 2015 by SuperHamster (talk | contribs) (SuperHamster moved page Talk:Rumors and Leaks to Talk:Rumors and leaks: Proper capitalization)

Latest comment: 18 June 2015 by Espyo in topic New Super Mario Sunshine Rumor

New Super Mario Sunshine Rumor

Recently, a new SMS DLC rumor has emerged, but I wasn't sure if I should add it or not. Opinions?
Images: http://squidboards.com/threads/the-splatoon-social-thread-not-the-bubbles.244/page-20#post-43554 Thesquidsisters (talk) 20:37, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I believe these were confirmed to be fake. Either way, I wouldn't post any leaks on the wiki until they are confirmed. ~SuperHamster Talk 21:13, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Now that I look at it, my link might be debunking something else - but I still wouldn't recommend posting something so unconfirmed and potentially fake. ~SuperHamster Talk 21:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Permission was given in the Skype chat, so I went ahead and added the images. If you would like me to revert the page, let me know :) Thesquidsisters (talk) 22:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looking at the page, it looks all right - nice job :) My only worry is having the page turn into a giant list of too many fake leaks. Ideally, leaks that are reputable and covered by trustworthy Nintendo news sites are what I think we should cover. But until that becomes a problem (if it does), I won't argue it. ~SuperHamster Talk 23:53, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
We could employ another rule: only leaks that generate massive discussion are allowed. If somebody on the depths of 4chan posts a blurry 64x64 image, and all the replies it gets are 4 people calling them an idiot, I hardly think we should try to cover that. – EspyoT 08:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]