Inkipedia talk:Ink Pump: Difference between revisions
From Inkipedia, the Splatoon wiki
(Created page with "<div class="widgett"> <p class="btextwidget">The Ink Pump</p> <p class="textwidget">Welcome to the '''Ink Pump'''. Similar to Wikipedia's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipe...") |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Consensus template == | == Consensus template == | ||
With the recent difficulties of getting formal consensus to make decisions, I'd like to suggest that we make a template that can be used to mark a major discussion. Pages with the template could be linked to on Recent Changes via a category or something. {{User:Nyargleblargle/Sig}} 20:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC) | With the recent difficulties of getting formal consensus to make decisions, I'd like to suggest that we make a template that can be used to mark a major discussion. Pages with the template could be linked to on Recent Changes via a category or something. {{User:Nyargleblargle/Sig}} 20:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
: I think we need clear guidelines on what makes a major discussion, and what is a consensus. A lot of decisions are made off-site now on Discord simply because it's real time chat and those on the server get notifications about it. Is a major discussion one that is time-pressured? Site-wide change? Site-interface change? Affects some (but not all) users, such as mobile? As for consensus... perhaps a time limit and if no-one bothers to vote then the motion is passed as a "not enough care one way or another". | |||
: We can certainly add more quick links to the top of Recent Changes via [[MediaWiki:Recentchangestext]] and to [[Inkipedia:Maintenance]] with the number of ongoing discussions (pages in the category). Perhaps make a quick filter list for [https://splatoonwiki.org/w/index.php?namespace=1&tagfilter=&title=Special%3ARecentChanges recent discussions], though I don't think you can filter by multiple namespaces? | |||
: We could make use of the [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice]] for really important discussions. | |||
: {{User:Kjhf/Sig}} 11:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:30, 28 July 2017
Consensus template
With the recent difficulties of getting formal consensus to make decisions, I'd like to suggest that we make a template that can be used to mark a major discussion. Pages with the template could be linked to on Recent Changes via a category or something. Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 20:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
- I think we need clear guidelines on what makes a major discussion, and what is a consensus. A lot of decisions are made off-site now on Discord simply because it's real time chat and those on the server get notifications about it. Is a major discussion one that is time-pressured? Site-wide change? Site-interface change? Affects some (but not all) users, such as mobile? As for consensus... perhaps a time limit and if no-one bothers to vote then the motion is passed as a "not enough care one way or another".
- We can certainly add more quick links to the top of Recent Changes via MediaWiki:Recentchangestext and to Inkipedia:Maintenance with the number of ongoing discussions (pages in the category). Perhaps make a quick filter list for recent discussions, though I don't think you can filter by multiple namespaces?
- We could make use of the MediaWiki:Sitenotice for really important discussions.
- User:Kjhf/Sig 11:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)