Inkipedia talk:Inkling of the Month

Delay December IotM?

If we use the regular schedule, voting will only go on for just over three days. So, I propose the following:

• Delay the end of the December voting and the start of January nominations to January 3rd, giving a full week for voting
• Delay the start of January voting to January 17th

The January voting will end on the usual day, so we'll still have two weeks for next month's nominations and voting each while giving a better amount of time to vote in December. We'll need a decision quickly for obvious reasons, so any thoughts? Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 02:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Bump. Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 01:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

If we don't come to a decision by midnight GMT on New Year's, we'll just go with the regular times. Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 01:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Nominators and Voting

I thought that nominators were not allowed to vote on their nominees based on their nomination really counts as an automatic vote. However we seem to have allowed nominators to vote this time. We should finalise a rule about this. User:Kjhf/Sig 10:41, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

I think nominators have been voting on their nominee for a while, but I suppose it's pretty pointless so after this month it could be made a rule. 11:22, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Should we add unnoticed people to ItoM?

So when I mean unnoticed, I mean:

• People who have contributed 35+ times

• At least 33 mainspace edits
• Their user page and user talk page count as 2

• Any subpages from the user page count only as # (where # = number of user subpages))

• Their account was created in the past month

• Give or take 7 days

22:00, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

I don't really understand the point of this. 20:42, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

It's just for the awareness how many unnoticed users there are. It's optional, anyways. 20:47, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

IOTM

Is this page ded \/\/00|\/|¥/Woomy$₽|_@+|\|€R|]@G€|\|+4/SplatNerdAgent4\/€€|\/|0/Veemo (Talk) 14:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

It seems like there isn't enough interest at keeping this procedure running, So it is currently closed. 14:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Lemme reviv ded page

I seem to often revive dead pages. I can see this page being maybe useful. We should reward hardworking editors.--User:Prinz the overlord/Sig 23:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

I think that personal thank you messages are a better way of letting someone know you appreciate their efforts. Like, if you see someone working hard, write a thank you message on their talk page. Heddy (talk) 21:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Long time...

Uh, should we start doing this again? I dunno, I just thought the concept sounded fun, and we haven't don't this for like, 5 years now. Just a thought. ArivakiVA 17:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Seems like we should. I didn't even know this page existed but after taking a look, it seems like a good idea. Might motivate people to edit more which is good especially with the onslaught of new content flooding in from Nintendo. Woomy? (talk) 18:45, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Yeah! Good idea!   ArivakiVA   (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Also I meant 'done' not 'don't'. Jeez, auto-correct hates me.   ArivakiVA   (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

I believe it would be a good idea but I'm not sure we would have enough people on board. That's just me, and it could be subject to change so ignore me. Xan 19:05, 21 November 2022 (UTC)