Inkipedia:Ink Pump/Archives/2023-09-04

This page is an archive.

It contains older discussions that are no longer ongoing. If you wish to discuss one of the topics here, please bring it up on the current discussion page.

Proposing the Proposals Proposal with the Proposals Proposal Proposal

Hello gang. I am suggesting that Inkipedia implements a Proposal system similar to Wikipedia, MarioWiki, Pikipedia, and WiKirby. This will allow easier, consistent site changes to the site viewable in one place. It can be found at the following Proposals Proposal Proposal page—voting is available on this page. Trig - 23:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

There are a few things I think need discussing regarding this, the first is: do we need a new policy page for this? Why not modify the voting and consensus policies? Heddy (talk) 00:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Update: before we can vote on implementing Trig's proposed system for proposals, we have to make Inkipedia policy compatible with it. Specifically, Inkipedia's policy of requiring consensus but not clearly defining what consensus is, and allowing a single staff member to shoot down proposals, is what must be changed first. I will create an Ink Pump vote for this, in a new section. Heddy (talk) 01:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

The consensus policy is now compatible with Trig's proposed dedicated page for submitting proposals. Now, we will vote to approve the creation of the dedicated proposal page. If successful, this should be the last policy proposal vote to take place in Ink Pump, though Ink Pump will continue to be the place to discuss proposals before votes are created. Heddy (talk) 07:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Make a Main Page/Challenge tab

The Challenge mode tab for the wiki should be added soon. Limited-time events like this usually come up on the Main Page, and it should be added there too soon. KPOfficial26 (talk) 14:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Yeah I feel like it should too! I'll ask someone who can edit the page if they can add it! *aggressive introverting* Mariefan 15:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

It seems like these ltms like these might be main-page worthy only when they are available. I'll put some options in another reply. -Xando (talk) 15:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

In my opinion, Challenges have a similar status to Eggstra Work and should therefore be on the Main Page. At least the New Season Challenge should be added there. Whether other Challenges will be added to the schedule would depend on their frequency. EminenceTalk 15:42, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Assesing some options to put Challenges on main page. Please note YOU ARE NOT VOTING ON THIS. This is just something I put together to assess options. Reply to talk about the options.

1: Similar to splatfests, add challenges as soon as they are announced and keep them until another challenge is announced

One might like option one due to staying in-the-know at all times for upcoming and concluded challenges.

2: Add challenges only a day or so before they start, and take them down about a day before they end There's a lot of stuff on the main page, but it's main page worthy enough.

2a Add another widget in and extend the page

2bi: Replace big run widget

2bii: Replace splatfest widget

2biii: Replace whichever is older/not ongoing at the moment.

3: Don't add them onto main page at all This might be because there's too much stuff on the main page already, and what's there already should stay there.

-Xando (talk) 15:53, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

We do not yet know the frequency of challenges, if they are more frequent than once per month or something, we should create a different widget to not obstruct the schedule for less frequent events. If they are around once a month, I think it is fine to implement a Challenge schedule the same way as Big Run/Splatfest/Eggstra Work schedules. EminenceTalk 15:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Do we know the frequency of challenges now? They seem like once or maybe twice a week. Maybe we could treat them like Salmon Run in S2? -Random 22:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Pages for major minor musicians

So this is a topic that's been on my mind a bit after the addition of Yoko & the Gold Bazookas in the latest Splatoon 3 update. As it currently stands, I really like the system we have in place for handling lore for minor band members. Most of them don't have enough information to warrant getting their own pages, and given most of these characters are only ever seen in the context of their respective bands, it makes sense to handle the information this way. I feel like making dedicated pages for most of these characters would only lead to a lot of unnecessary clutter more efficiently conveyed in a single page.

That being said, in Splatoon 3, we've been seeing many more instances of musicians featuring in multiple bands, which has me questioning how we should handle these characters. Previously, Quinn was the only example of this, and while splitting his information across two pages felt somewhat awkward, it made more sense than making an exception for a single musician. But with characters like Ichiya and Yoko (and to a lesser extent, Nami and Murasaki) getting similar treatments, I feel it may be worth re-evaluating how we handle them. I still feel like these characters may be too minor to warrant their own pages, but at the same time, I feel it'd be nice to have all the information on them in one place rather than splitting it up somewhat arbitrarily, and it'd be useful for handling minor factoids unrelated to either of their bands (e.g. Beika mentioning Ichiya growing up in the Splatlands).

(For clarification, I'm solely considering this for characters that have been in multiple bands. For characters like the Bottom Feeders, I still feel like just putting all their information on the band page is the right call, given there's not really any reason to handle it otherwise.)

I'm genuinely not sure where I fall on this myself, so I'd love to hear how others think we should address this. WayslideCool (talk) 04:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

I think that it makes more sense to have separate pages for some of the musicians in multiple bands. I agree with the reasons you mentioned. I think there is enough information about Quinn and Ichiya for them to have their own pages, as well as possibly Yoko. I don't think there is enough information about Nami and Murasaki for them to have their own pages. I am concerned that the new pages will be very short, but it will make information about them easier to find, as well as making it possible to add information such as the things from the Splatune 3 booklet.  GX_64 (talk)  06:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

I think I feel about the same way, I only brought up Nami and Murasaki because they've also been in multiple bands, but given they're barely mentioned in the Splatune 3 booklet, I'm not sure if they really deserve pages of their own. I feel like if we're going to go through with this, however, we'd need to decide on some parameter that defines whether a character "deserves" their own page or not. I decided to write a rough draft of what a Quinn page could look like in my sandbox, and I'm not honestly sure if it's swung me either way on this proposal. I think it feels really nice to have all this information in one place rather than needing to look around multiple pages to get the full picture, but I also kinda feel like it's just restating a lot of information that may fit better elsewhere. I don't think the article feels too short though, I feel like our articles on a lot of the shopkeepers are of a similar length. I'm personally always gonna be a little biased in favor of the bands, but that's no way to run a wiki, is it? WayslideCool (talk) 12:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Sorry if this is written badly. I am slightly tired right now since it is late.

Your draft is great. It definitely has enough information. I agree that it is nice to have all the information on one page.

If we do make these pages, could the parameter for deciding whether a character gets one possibly be currently having a significant amount of information about them on multiple pages? For example, Quinn has information in both Squid Squad and Diss-Pair, and Ichiya has information in Squid Squad along with being mentioned in the Splatune 3 booklet. I am still not sure about whether Yoko needs a page, since there isn't a lot of information about her. However, the information about her on the Ink Theory page that is still relevant now, so it seems strange for it to all be there.

Maybe we should create pages for any member in multiple bands? The issue then is that there will be some short pages without much information, but maybe that is better than having information about characters on multiple pages. For example, someone reading Front Roe would find out very little about the members unless they also look at Squid Squad. If there were pages for Nami and Murasaki, then I think it is more likely that people reading the Front Roe page would also look at those pages than the Squid Squad page, since the links to them will be in the Members section.  GX_64 (talk)  14:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

I'm on board with the idea of dedicated musician pages if they are members of multiple groups. Trig - 18:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

I think that this would only make sense if it was on a case-by-case basis, especially because of Nami and Murasaki. I definitely agree, but I think that this should be consistently rediscussed whenever there is a new situation where it might be warranted for a band member to have their own page. ^-^ Wave (talk) 17:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

New stage dialog.

Is adding the new stage specific dialog from the splatcast to stages quote pages on the to do list? Mrawesome1010 (talk) 04:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Some editors are already working on this, feel free to add missing quotes if you find any, especially in other languages! Thanks! EminenceTalk 16:30, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

There is a database I found with the stage quotes. Go to this database, then use the Find Text feature to find News_VersusStage and find the stage's codename. For now, we don't know who is speaking in the game. KPOfficial26 (talk) 10:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

6 day difference, but I think it would be a good idea to add Deep Cut's dialogue to the to do list as it is a major project—though if we had more people working on quotes for Deep Cut, this would be a piece of cake.. -Random 15:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Why did I get banned on Discord?

I'm sorry if I got banned, please put back up the invite link. I won't image spam anymore. KPOfficial26 (talk) 11:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello KPOfficial26. If you were banned solely for image spamming, you likely ignored many warnings to stop. That doesn't happen very often, so you may have performed more severe actions than that.

In any case, bans on the Discord server are not hugely common and there's generally good reasons for such measures. You may want to think about any actions you could have taken as of late that caused disruption or friction within the server, especially if other users have reacted negatively to such actions. Ballistik57 (talk) 13:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Image spam is the least of your worries. From frequently ignoring moderation team asking you to stop doing things like micromanaging, being wildly off-topic, and generally just kind of annoying to broadly making the server uncomfortable whether thats by streaming awkwardly showing your face, making racially insensitive comments, or pissin' on VC. You very clearly have zero understanding of cyber-security or image, and while everyone does need to start somewhere, Inkipedia will not be that place. In an indeterminately long time from today if you believe you have matured significantly from where you are now, you are free to appeal this decision with me (this means many months, minimum) in private. Trig - 17:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Cephalopod of the Month or something?

Hey everyone! I think I might've pitched this a while back, but do any of you think we should bring back Squid/Cephalopod of the Month? I personally think that this might motivate some to edit more. I say that because I usually only see the same people making edits when I check the Recent Changes. Just a thought. Let me know what you think! Arivaki-Kun (banter) 17:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

This sounds like a good idea, but how would this be carried out? Something like a vote? ℂ𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕥.𝕠𝕔𝕥𝕠 (ℙ𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕥𝕝𝕖) 21:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

This has also been brought up on Inkipedia talk:Inkling of the Month. Staff are discussing it now. Trig - 23:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for letting me know. Have a great day. Arivaki-Kun (banter) 16:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Older Weapon Strategy Pages

While looking at older weapon strategy pages (like Splatoon weapons), I noticed there were a lot of extra categories in the infoboxes and of unfinished work. It seemed pretty unnecessary to bother filling these in since most people stopped playing the original game six years ago, but I wanted to get others opinion. Should we focus on the newest release, or should we continue to add information to almost irrelevant areas of the page? Adding to both is also possible, but it is very time consuming and most people come here looking for information on the current game versus the older one. Could I get some insight? Thanks :) ℂ𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕥.𝕠𝕔𝕥𝕠 (ℙ𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕥𝕝𝕖) 22:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

In my opinion, it would make sense to try and fill out at least the rudimentary details of those weapons and upgrade them to modern styling. I don't think the descriptions could be feasibly upgraded much, as long as they are generally well written and have relatively coherent detail it should be fine. Trig - 22:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Alright, thank you for your help. ℂ𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕥.𝕠𝕔𝕥𝕠 (ℙ𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕥𝕝𝕖) 23:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Documenting the video advertisements found in hubs

Hi everyone, I noticed that almost nowhere online seems to document the videos that play on the big screens in the hubs of each game (+ the lobby in Splatoon 3). With how some advertisements interact with in-game events (Big Run) and some seemingly teasing upcoming updates (Z+F was in the game via these ads before they were announced), I feel like it would be good to document them in some way here. These would probably all be put in the galleries of each Hub page.

The ads in-game also seem to have a filter applied to them, so if ripping is feasible, it might make these ads more clear. This could be helpful for the Inkling (language) page since these ads incorporate a lot of text. Ripping wouldn't be necessary for documentation, though, as these can be recorded in-game (though this may be harder for Splatoon 1 and 2). I also don't have access to Splatoon 1, so someone else would need to record those.

Whether you're interested in this, opposed to it, or just have ideas, I'd love to hear your thoughts, so let me know :] Cackle (talk) 19:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

To my knowledge these are simple to extract, but I would prefer short clips of each ad are captured instead; extracting the (frame by frame) animations then re-stitching them as .gifs leads to a major loss in quality. Certain animations may have some filters baked-in as well, but my memory's fuzzy on the specifics.

The large amount of per-game ads on these screens is reason enough to document these in dedicated subsections per Hub article, or a unified separate article handling documenting all of them. Yoshifan52 (talk) 06:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

The filters being baked in is interesting. Asking out of curiosity: do you know if that's the case for Splatoon 3 or just the earlier games? I'm also not sure if there's enough content for a dedicated article. While some ads have interesting trivia attatched to them (specifically Z+F having an ad before it was in the game), most of the ones I know of are pretty basic and can be summed up in a caption. Maybe a category would be better? Cackle (talk) 00:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

I believe the Splatoon 2 ads also had some effects baked in, but I'm not 100% certain. Regardless though, in-game footage (preferably recorded with a capture card) is easier to work with. I'll try to take a look at the internal animations soon, I'll give an update on how workable they are.

A sub-section on the hub page is my preferred means of documenting all of them, but that might be too large an amount of video clips to load on an already decently sized page... We have in-universe Company and Graffiti articles already, I don't see why we couldn't make an "Advertisements" article for these ads. I don't think a unique category is necessary, especially since several users have been working to lessen the use of over-specific categories that don't contain a substantial amount of items. Yoshifan52 (talk) 03:37, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the info! I have a capture card so I'm good to do that. I think the text in the ads is most likely gibberish anyway so clear text isn't necessary to get the information across (and mimicked pieces of text will probably be clear as-is since they're intended to be seen).

About the "Advertisements" article/category: thank you for explaining, I hadn't considered how all the videos could impact loading times. Also, I've since found some non-hub video ads so those could fit in an article like that too. Cackle (talk) 14:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Happy to help, sounds great! Yoshifan52 (talk) 23:45, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Hey, I've now recorded all the in-game videos I could find in S2 and S3, but I've realised that some of the videos I've recorded don't really look like ads for anything (specifically the animations that play above the entrance to Splatoon 2's lobby). I still feel like these should be documented, but I don't know if they'd fit in an "Advertisements" article. Do you think they'd be okay there? Cackle (talk) 04:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

I think this is a great idea! I would definitely be willing to help with recording them since I have all 3 games. I could rip the textures, but I do agree with Yoshifan that in-game clips are the better way to go for the wiki.

Though, if anyone does want them ripped for deciphering, I can extract them (and compile the animated ones into webps) and upload them to google drive or something instead 👍 Sourguppyworm (talk) 08:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Cool! I'm not sure about the other games but from what I've checked in Splatoon 3's ads, the text is complete gibberish so ripping probably won't be necessary. There aren't many Splatoon 2 ads so I could probably record them all soon. I could also do Splatoon 3's, though I'm not sure which screen to record atm since they all have different flaws haha. Would you want to record Splatoon 1's ads? Cackle (talk) 23:29, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

i can do that! i'll record them later today so i don't forget again 😅 Sourguppyworm (talk) 20:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you & don't worry about it! I still need to record mine haha Cackle (talk) 20:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Template for Top 100 Splatfest subpages

I think subpages (specifically the Top 100 Splatfest) subpages should get a template of their own, instead of just using the {{Main}} template. I made a template (basically a mockery of real templates), here: User:Randomnamehere/Top 100 template. Subpages like quotes and gallery get their own template, so should the Top 100 subpage. -Random 16:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

I like this! It looks very recognisable, which is something we need for a template that would be used on so many pages, and would likely save time too. GloverMist (talk) 18:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Is this the "okay" for the template? From what I have seen, only administrators can create templates. -Random 00:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Anyone may make templates. Just happens that administrators tend to make them pretty often. This looks fine to me, though I think there could probably be a better image used instead of the current ??? panel. Trig - 03:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes, i'm trying to work on creating an image... the ??? is a placeholder. -Random 04:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Looks great to me! Yoshifan52 (talk) 05:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Just a question, for template images, am I allowed to create the image myself, if I am, would I have to run the image by everyone to see if it can be a template image, or what? @GloverMist @Trig Jegman @Yoshifan52 -Random 19:58, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

You can create an image if you'd like, though keep in mind vector images are strongly preferred for that kind of template. If anyone strongly thinks your image needs more work or to be replaced, they'll message you. Yoshifan52 (talk) 00:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Do you think this might be a good image? I've been struggling with an image so... heres the image -Random 00:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Hmm, this image is cool but doesn't look as professional as the graphics we typically use for things like this, and it isn't a vector image. I'll ask an experienced with making these types of graphics editor if they can help soon. Yoshifan52 (talk) 02:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Here is the graphic I requested courtesy of 6-Frisk. If it's alright with you, I think your template would be good to go once its image is swapped for this one. I'll be available to add the template to the Splatfest pages ASAP. Yoshifan52 (talk) 23:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Aw... it looks alot like the gallery image... which I wasn't wanting to go for. -Random 01:16, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm a consistent person so... if we use this image... shouldn't the image for the quotes template also be changed to look similar to this? -Random 01:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

I believe Heddy brought up the topic of changing that one as well recently, but several people seemed fine with keeping the green balloon version for now. Personally I would also prefer they're consistent, but I don't feel too strongly about it. The best place to bring that up would be in a separate Ink Pump topic, or on the template's talk page. Yoshifan52 (talk) 20:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Also, now that it crosses my mind... Splatoon has MVP in Japan, not Top 100. Should that be made into a seperate page as well? @GloverMist @Trig Jegman @Yoshifan52? -Random 16:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Using in-game images

I'm currently trying to add to the Competitive:Burst Bomb page, and I noticed that there is not a single image in the Burst Bomb gallery that depicts the bomb without being an in-game screenshot. I didn't really know where to look for the image policy, but would it be ok to take an image of a burst bomb (either the in-game icon or the actual model) and remove the background? Sorry if this is a dumb question! Thanks :) ℂ𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕥.𝕠𝕔𝕥𝕠 (ℙ𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕥𝕝𝕖) 03:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

I don't know, if there is no promo image, use icons then. The 3D icon can be good as it matches the theme of the competitive infobox images. The 3D models would be too stretched out, and 2D icons won't help with the aesthetic. Hope this helps! KPOfficial26 (talk) 00:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

@Clarinet.octo: That page is about competitive and strategy information. It's not the place for images. To find images of Burst Bomb, you should see the main article: Burst Bomb Heddy (talk) 04:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

The infobox would be empty without an image and would only have a red file. Generally there is an image in there, but there doesn't have to be. I checked the Burst Bomb page and there were only in-game promo images. There really aren't that many images of the bomb in general, so there isn't much of a theme- although competitive pages typically use the 3D promotional image of the weapon, sub, or special. I was mainly questioning if it is ok to take a screenshot of the icon or model, blur it, and then put it on the wiki. Sorry for the confusion. (This would mean for the Splatoon 3 section since there are images in the other two). I wouldn't be adding a gallery to the page, which I think is what you are referring to @Heddy. Thank you. ℂ𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕥.𝕠𝕔𝕥𝕠 (ℙ𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕥𝕝𝕖) 15:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

• by blur I mean remove the background

ℂ𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕥.𝕠𝕔𝕥𝕠 (ℙ𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕥𝕝𝕖) 21:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

My bad, I was indeed thinking the question was about adding a gallery to a competitive page; disregard that comment.

To answer your question, it is discouraged to edit images or remove backgrounds, since the wiki is supposed to be limited to official images.

As KPOfficial26 suggested, it may be best to use one of the icons. Heddy (talk) 05:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for telling me, I will do that. ℂ𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕥.𝕠𝕔𝕥𝕠 (ℙ𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕥𝕝𝕖) 16:58, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

By the way, this is the image. Click on this: KPOfficial26 (talk) 18:42, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

MVP for Splatoon

I made a template for the Top 100s for Splatfests, but that only raises another question. In Splatoon, there is MVP, there is also Top 100 but that is later on in the string of Splatfests. Should MVP get a subpage as well? And if it does get a subpage, will it be treated like Top 100 and use the same template? (The {{Top 100}} template) -Random 20:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

I think MVP doesn't need a subpage because it lists only the top 5 players of each team instead of the top 100. KPOfficial26 (talk) 14:17, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

So, should we mash the MVP with Top 100 or just keep it on the Splatfest page? -Random 17:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Let's keep it on the Splatfest page. The MVP is separate from the Top 100 and was introduced before the Top 100 came into existence. KPOfficial26 (talk) 18:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Agreed with keeping MVP on the Splaftest page. And just for context if anyone is not aware: Nintendo created the MVP lists for early Japanese Splatfests only, so you will see MVP lists in very few Splatfest articles. Heddy (talk) 01:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

I agree with KPOfficial26 and Heddy here. I'd like to note that the reason the Top 100 players data was moved from the Splatfest pages onto separate subpages was due to the Top 100 data being excessively large in byte size, to the point that adding it to the Splatfest pages would thereafter make them struggle to load for many users. After discussing it, we decided the best course of action is moving the data to subpages.

The MVP data is very much worth noting, but unless its individual writeups are in the 60,000-150,000 byte range (as is the case with the Top 100 data) I don't think it's necessary to generate subpages for them. Yoshifan52 (talk) 21:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

In case anyone is wondering, MVP sections are about 15,000 bytes each, on average. Very small in comparison to Top 100 data. Heddy (talk) 22:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Voting has started for demotion policy overhaul

Trig Jegman submitted a policy proposal: Inkipedia:Proposals/Demotion Policy Overhaul

Please vote at the above link!

From now on, new policy proposals will be at Inkipedia:Proposals, and Trig's demotion policy overhaul is the first proposal to use that new system! Ink Pump can still be used to brainstorm policy ideas, to gauge support for a proposal before submitting it for voting, and to ask questions about policy, but the actual finalized proposals and voting should take place at Inkipedia:Proposals. Ink Pump should no longer be used for major policy proposal votes. This is per the consensus policy. Heddy (talk) 06:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

New gear has been accidentally released in Splatoon 3

I recently heard that someone actually got the Captain's unused gear via an email from Nintendo. It seems that the gear is supposed to be released in Splatoon 3 during its 1 year anniversary. It contains a code to redeem on Nintendo eShop. The code contained these gear: the Legendary Cap (headgear), the Legendary Cape (clothing), and the Legendary Sandals (shoes). If anyone likes for me to add them on the wiki (if I do it now, admins would have to revert my edits), you can talk about it here. The cap has Last-Ditch Effort, the cape has Ninja Squid, and the sandals have Run Speed Up. They are 1 star items produced by Cuttlegear. KPOfficial26 (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

If you don't believe me, check this: @kegshinpu on Twitter. KPOfficial26 (talk) 23:57, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

A well known dataminer has said this is fake. Cackle (talk) 00:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

That tweet doesn't exist, also a lot of people did receive it so it's likely real. OrderSquid38 [Talk] 00:43, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Whoops, didn't realise that tweet got deleted. It was just a screenshot of a discord conversation with Diam so I took another one here. The people in the quotes and replies that got codes seem to all have histories of modding their switches, so I would take their accounts with a grain of salt. Cackle (talk) 00:52, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Wait nevermind, turns out I accidentally stuck a "ke" at the end of the link. Here's the actual twitter link haha, sorry about that. Cackle (talk) 01:00, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

These aren't even released yet to the public, so we shouldn't add it yet to the wiki. Perhaps it could go in Rumors and leaks. OrderSquid38 [Talk] 00:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

The email in the tweet calls Captain "Captain Agent 3". Has Nintendo ever called Captain that before? It sounds strange.  GX_64 (talk)  02:13, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

No, that's why it's fake. Even the date is wrong OrderSquid38 [Talk] 02:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Coverage of kits' combos to splat

I think we should cover how to use a weapon kit for damage to result in a splat on main weapon pages. For example, on the Splattershot page, we could cover 3x main shot to splat, 2x main shots and Suction off-hit, 1x main shot and 1x Trizooka off-hit. Slate Talk Contribs 22:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

So, a paragraph stating all the ways a kit has to reach 100+ damage? Heddy (talk) 22:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes, or very near to it (e.g. 99+ damage) Slate Talk Contribs 13:44, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Okay, I think it's a good idea. For reference, competitive space has combos listed in its articles, but competitive space tends to incorporate strategies and uncommon or highly skillful ways to use or exploit game mechanics. A comparatively simpler (facts-only, no-strategy) paragraph in mainspace articles seems like it would be potentially useful to most readers. It would be within the scope of mainspace as long as it's completely factual. I can't think of any downside to having a paragraph like that in each main weapon article. Heddy (talk) 23:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Add YeaSubSpecial to main weapon appearances

We don't currently have a good way of showing all the weapon sets' with main weapon varieties and their subs and specials. I want to make this information available on the main weapon page. I've started this with {{YeaSubSpecial}}. There's a demo on one of my userpages of what this looks like for just the Sploosh (I didn't want to waste time on all the shooters then all the main weapons if people don't like the idea).

If you would like to get involved please edit my page or comment here. Slate Talk Contribs 12:18, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

"We don't currently have a good way of showing all the weapon sets' with main weapon varieties and their subs and specials." But that info is already on list pages like List of weapons in Splatoon 3. The list pages are linked at the bottom of the main weapon page. Adding sub-special to the "main weapon" page would be unnecessary duplication.

I like the simplicity of the "main weapon" page, in that it just focuses on the main weapon. If we added sub-special to the "main weapon" page, it becomes closer to information overload, and reduces the need to visit the "list of weapons in game" pages. Heddy (talk) 21:56, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Awesome, I did forget about that list page. I've linked to it from the main page by game. Happy with the resolution there :) Slate Talk Contribs 13:43, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Splatfest infoboxes

Should we update Splatoon 2 and Splatoon 1 articles to use the Splatoon 3 Splatfest infobox, or should we change the Splatoon 3 article infoboxes to be like the infoboxes of Splatoon 2 and Splatoon 1 articles? Or, should we do nothing to make the articles more consistent?

Personally, I think the approach used in the Splatoon 3 articles is better. It uses the infobox to summarize the results, instead of having every detail crammed in the box, and has the detailed results in a separate table. I personally believe that infoboxes are best used to summarize at-a-glance information. It looks better and if the information you need is not in the infobox, it can potentially be presented better, such as the Splatoon 3 Splatfest results table which is a better way to present every part of the results due to being a custom table for that specific purpose and not trying to fit it into the "Data type: data value" format of infoboxes.

However, some people believe that infoboxes should contain every possible detail, and big wikis like Wikipedia do actually put every possible data point in their infoboxes, and I understand if people prefer that approach. If everything in the infobox is what the majority wants, then we will need to change the Splatoon 3 Splatfest infoboxes to be more like the Splatoon 2 and Splatoon 1 Splatfest infoboxes, which might be a difficult task if a custom infobox is used to neatly present every bit of the result as well as other info like dates and team names and ink colors.

To repeat the question, should we update S1/S2 articles to use the S3 Splatfest infobox style, or should we change S3 article infoboxes to be like S1/S2 infoboxes? Or should we do nothing? Heddy (talk) 23:55, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Update the S1 and 2 to be more in-keeping with all our other infoboxes is my vote. Slate Talk Contribs 13:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

I also vote to update S1/S2 to match the S3 style. Keeping the infobox as a summary and adding the details in a separate table is much easier to read and parse, in my opinion! GloverMist (talk) 15:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

New challenges cluttering up the Challenges page

I feel like the past/upcoming challenges on the Challenge page is starting to clutter up most of the page. Here's an idea that I thought up. There would be a simple list of challenges, and each of them would link to its own page. Upcoming challenges will be shown at the end of the list, and past challenges would be shown on their respective page. Does this sound like a great idea? KPOfficial26 (talk) 10:18, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

like that idea - probably want to make a separate article (e.g. List of Challenges) then transclude it {{:List of Challenges}}. Looks like Xevsplatoon has already begun work on that Slate Talk Contribs 13:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

The Current Grizz co. Outfit

Do you think it's a reference to the Tron series? If so, then we should say that, since many other GC items are references to other media. Wind Waker (talk) 16:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Plus it's "retro future" which fits the Tron series Wind Waker (talk) 16:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Ah, I see someone just added it, cewl Wind Waker (talk) 22:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Spanish flag for localized names

I noticed when the French NOE and NOA have the same name, it shows a flag split in half of France and Canada. I was wondering why Spanish doesn't have a split-flag of Spain and Mexico? I think that we should make it so that if Spanish NOE and NOA have the same name they should also have a split flag to match French. What do you think? Splatunie (talk) 23:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

I uploaded the Spain and Mexico flag for this but I'm not sure how to make it show on the localized name template. Can someone do that please? Thanks! SplatunieTalk 02:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

I think I did it, the flag should be updated now. -Random 21:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Awesome, thank you! SplatunieTalk 22:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

A template for manga pages on the Inkipedia?

I come again with another template idea. There should be a template solely for manga pages with the same purpose as the {{real}} template. Or maybe another template can be used instead like the {{unofficial}} template.

I think this template would have same argument as the {{real}} template... distinguishing stuff from the manga and the actual game can be hard for some people, so a notice could be pretty useful at times, etc, etc. -Random 21:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

This seems extremely unnecessary to me. Most manga pages state that the subject is related to the Splatoon Manga in the first line of the page. If a user does not read the first line of the page, they are not going to read a template notice either. Secondly, there are discussions currently ongoing about whether the Real template should be deleted. That discussion, located here, could give you some insights as to why a Manga template would be unnecessary. EminenceTalk 00:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Well, I also believe that the {{real}} template is a very useful template, or something similar. Maybe the template could be merged with an already existing template like the {{Unofficial}} template? -Random 01:59, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

If you would like to discuss the existence of the Real template, please use the associated talk page. Thanks! EminenceTalk 02:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC)