User talk:P.J. GT: Difference between revisions
From Inkipedia, the Splatoon wiki
Latest comment: 25 October 2022 by Cruelty to Salmons in topic Continued discussion of prediction of future weapon kits
(Added link to third Archive.) |
(→Continued discussion of prediction of future weapon kits: new section) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<small>The current pagesize is {{PAGESIZE:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} bytes</small>.</span> | <small>The current pagesize is {{PAGESIZE:{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} bytes</small>.</span> | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Continued discussion of prediction of future weapon kits == | |||
The jet squelcher’s main problem in splatoon 2 was that some players would play backline and rack up 10+ specials, spamming tenta missiles. Having its special long range would just continue that problem, so it would be better to have options like wave breaker, big bubbler, or ultra stamp that require front line action would be a better fit. [[User:Cruelty to Salmons|Cruelty to Salmons]] ([[User talk:Cruelty to Salmons|talk]]) 19:13, 25 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:13, 25 October 2022
Messages archived log 1 (11 March 2020 - 2 November 2020)
Messages archived log 2 (14 November 2020 - 21 May 2021)
Messages archived log 3 (21 May 2021 - 24 October 2022)
| File:Marina.png | This page will be archived after it exceeds 35,000 bytes. The current pagesize is 1,263 bytes. |
Continued discussion of prediction of future weapon kits
The jet squelcher’s main problem in splatoon 2 was that some players would play backline and rack up 10+ specials, spamming tenta missiles. Having its special long range would just continue that problem, so it would be better to have options like wave breaker, big bubbler, or ultra stamp that require front line action would be a better fit. Cruelty to Salmons (talk) 19:13, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
