Talk:Octoling (enemy): Difference between revisions
From Inkipedia, the Splatoon wiki
Latest comment: 9 September 2016 by OsFortyTwo
(+reply) |
(→Why are there ONLY Female Octolings: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldnt there be more on the Octoling hack?Also maybye should it have its own page or a section in rumors and leaks?[[User:OsFortyTwo|OsFortyTwo]] ([[User talk:OsFortyTwo|talk]]) 16:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | Shouldnt there be more on the Octoling hack?Also maybye should it have its own page or a section in rumors and leaks?[[User:OsFortyTwo|OsFortyTwo]] ([[User talk:OsFortyTwo|talk]]) 16:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
: I agree it should be covered, though it is a hack and so it would need external citations. I wouldn't expect there to be enough material for its own page: a section under [[Rumors and leaks]] would suffice. {{User:Kjhf/Sig}} 16:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | : I agree it should be covered, though it is a hack and so it would need external citations. I wouldn't expect there to be enough material for its own page: a section under [[Rumors and leaks]] would suffice. {{User:Kjhf/Sig}} 16:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Why are there ONLY Female Octolings == | |||
WHY IN THE SPLATOONIVERSE IS THERE O-N-L-Y FEMALE OCTOLINGS; AND WHEN ARE WE E-V-E-R(IF WE EVEN GET THEM AT ALL) GONNA BE ABLE TO PLAY AS OCTOLINGS?!?!?!?!?!?!?! | |||
Revision as of 23:06, 17 May 2017
Shouldnt there be more on the Octoling hack?Also maybye should it have its own page or a section in rumors and leaks?OsFortyTwo (talk) 16:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- I agree it should be covered, though it is a hack and so it would need external citations. I wouldn't expect there to be enough material for its own page: a section under Rumors and leaks would suffice. User:Kjhf/Sig 16:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Why are there ONLY Female Octolings
WHY IN THE SPLATOONIVERSE IS THERE O-N-L-Y FEMALE OCTOLINGS; AND WHEN ARE WE E-V-E-R(IF WE EVEN GET THEM AT ALL) GONNA BE ABLE TO PLAY AS OCTOLINGS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
