User talk:Splatzoner
Spoilers
It's awesome that you've been improving the wiki, but please make sure to put a spoiler warning on some of the more story-based pages that you've edited. We wouldn't want to ruin it for anyone, right? Sigma talk 22:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Right, sorry. --Splatzoner (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- It's all good. Sigma talk 18:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia
Hello there! When linking to Wikipedia, be sure to make use of the prefix wikipedia: instead of raw linking. Thanks. --Raltseye prata med mej 13:35, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
RE: your edit to "Salmon Run"
Please allow me to explain my rationale for reverting your edit. You removed the fire rate comparison with the .52 Gal and replaced it with a comparison with the Clash Blaster. The Grizzco Blaster and .52 Gal both fire a shot every 9 frames. This can be verified by viewing a 60FPS YouTube video of a weapon, pausing the video, and hitting the ">" button on your keyboard to step through each frame. Saying that it has a fire rate superior to the Clash Blaster is true, but it's a less useful comparison to draw due the .52 Gal having the exact same stat; the .52 Gal comparison gives the reader a much more accurate idea of the Grizzco Blaster's fire rate because it is exactly the same. The original description said that the Grizzco Blaster has the damage output of a Clash Blaster, while your edit claims it retains the power of the regular Blaster. This is verifiably untrue: The regular Blaster can splat a Chum in one hit, while the Grizzco Blaster cannot. The Grizzco Blaster needs multiple hits just like the Clash Blaster does, which is why it is correct to compare its power with the Clash Blaster as the description originally did. Heddy (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- When I saw it being used alongside a Clash Blaster, it did manage to splat a Chum in fewer shots than the Clash Blaster did, though. So it would still be accurate to say it is stronger than the Clash Blaster. --Splatzoner (talk) 02:35, 28 September 2017 (UTC)