Inkipedia:Featured content: Difference between revisions
(Squid Sisters won) |
|||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:It shows the username of whoever is reading the page. Anyway, as for the article itself, I like it, though it could stand to be a bit more concise. {{User:Nyargleblargle/Sig}} 22:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC) | :It shows the username of whoever is reading the page. Anyway, as for the article itself, I like it, though it could stand to be a bit more concise. {{User:Nyargleblargle/Sig}} 22:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
::As the main contributor to that article, I agree. It is a bit all over the place in the sections. English is not my first language either, so I suspect some parts contain wonky formatting or wording {{User:AmbientDinosaur/Sig}} 10:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | ::As the main contributor to that article, I agree. It is a bit all over the place in the sections. English is not my first language either, so I suspect some parts contain wonky formatting or wording {{User:AmbientDinosaur/Sig}} 10:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
===[[Easter Eggs]]=== | ===[[Easter Eggs]]=== |
Revision as of 16:33, 1 June 2016
Featured articles are select pages that are shown on the main page. These should be articles with few to no major flaws, being complete, comprehensive, well-written, and accompanied by relevant media.
Nomination process
Featured articles can be proposed in the below section, where they can be voted on once by each user. Nominations may stay up for up to five voting periods before they are removed. An article may not be featured more than once a year.
On the first day of every even-numbered month, the article with the highest difference of those in favor minus those who oppose will be featured. Two articles will be featured at any time, comprising of the winners of the previous two voting periods.
Nominations can be made in the following format:
===[[Article]]===
Nominated by [[User:YourUsername|YourUsername]]
====Support====
====Oppose====
====Comments====
Nominations
Turf War
Nominated by Nyargleblargle
Support
- Slight Support as this page is pretty good and is one of the main stages. However there are a few things that need to be improved (in particular its gallery). User:Mr squid/Sig 19:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Oppose
- Slight oppose in current state. Has a good amount of information, but it could use some cleanup, better wording, a more natural flow, and some updating with new stuff. The last major edit was in September! D: The associated gallery is a bit sparse as well. --Bzeep! talk 19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose in current state. Lots of crowded text. outdated pic of camp for infobox and gallery and green particles at the gif in gallery. Not enough pictures for a big mode such as Turf War. User:Shachar700/Sig 19:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Slight oppose Again, the pre-release image of Camp Triggerfish that was mentioned above. This could be misleading to newer players. I understand that it is from an official Nintendo commercial, but I believe (more) updated images would be better. Skylar (talk) 21:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Comments
Weapon Brand
Nominated by Shachar700
Support
- Weak support
Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 22:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Weak support. It's definitely coming along! Has a lot of good info and the logos all look nice. We still have to work on in-game instances of the brands and some wording, though, as per the comments. --Bzeep! talk 19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
I like how I'm an example for a nomination format. :P We need image to summarize weapon brand if this gets selected. User:Shachar700/Sig 19:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- It shows the username of whoever is reading the page. Anyway, as for the article itself, I like it, though it could stand to be a bit more concise.
Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 22:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Easter Eggs
Nominated by Skylar
Support
Oppose
- Not a lot written on most of these.
Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 01:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- The page doesn't seem good enough to be a featured article, it needs more details! User:Mr squid/Sig 14:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)