Inkipedia:Featured content

Featured articles are select pages that are shown on the main page. These should be articles with few to no major flaws, being complete, comprehensive, well-written, and accompanied by relevant media.

Nomination process

Featured articles can be proposed in the below section, where they can be voted on once by each user. Nominations may stay up for up to five voting periods before they are removed. An article may not be featured more than once a year.

On the first day of every even-numbered month, the article with the highest difference of those in favor minus those who oppose will be featured. Two articles will be featured at any time, comprising of the winners of the previous two voting periods.

Nominations can be made in the following format:

===[[Article]]===
Nominated by [[User:YourUsername|YourUsername]]
====Support====
====Oppose====
====Comments====

Nominations

Turf War

Nominated by Nyargleblargle

Oppose

1. Slight oppose in current state. Has a good amount of information, but it could use some cleanup, better wording, a more natural flow, and some updating with new stuff. The last major edit was in September! D: The associated gallery is a bit sparse as well. --Bzeep! talk 19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
2. Oppose in current state. Lots of crowded text. outdated pic of camp for infobox and gallery and green particles at the gif in gallery. Not enough pictures for a big mode such as Turf War. User:Shachar700/Sig 19:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
3. Slight oppose Again, the pre-release image of Camp Triggerfish that was mentioned above. This could be misleading to newer players. I understand that it is from an official Nintendo commercial, but I believe (more) updated images would be better. Skylar (talk) 21:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Weapon Brand

Nominated by Shachar700

Support

1. Weak support Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 22:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
2. Weak support. It's definitely coming along! Has a lot of good info and the logos all look nice. We still have to work on in-game instances of the brands and some wording, though, as per the comments. --Bzeep! talk 19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments

I like how I'm an example for a nomination format. :P We need image to summarize weapon brand if this gets selected. User:Shachar700/Sig 19:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

It shows the username of whoever is reading the page. Anyway, as for the article itself, I like it, though it could stand to be a bit more concise. Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 22:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

As the main contributor to that article, I agree. It is a bit all over the place in the sections. English is not my first language either, so I suspect some parts contain wonky formatting or wording – 10:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Squid Sisters

Nominated by Lukey140701

Support

1. Support. It's complete without being too wordy and has a very appealing look to it, even if the gallery is getting a little big. --Bzeep! talk 19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Weak oppose. The trivia section is extremely large and some of the page is written a bit unprofessionally. Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 17:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Easter Eggs

Nominated by Skylar