Inkipedia:Featured content/Archives/1: Difference between revisions

From Inkipedia, the Splatoon wiki
No edit summary
m (Reverted edits by Nyargleblargle (talk) to last revision by SuperHamster)
Line 46: Line 46:


Now that the article has been improved and expanded, and that I have read the manga, I think that it is ''definitely'' good enough to be on the front page. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mr squid|Mr squid]] ([[User talk:Mr squid|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mr squid|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
Now that the article has been improved and expanded, and that I have read the manga, I think that it is ''definitely'' good enough to be on the front page. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mr squid|Mr squid]] ([[User talk:Mr squid|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mr squid|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
===[[Turf War]]===
Nominated by [[User:Nyargleblargle|Nyargleblargle]]
====Support====
#'''Slight Support''' as this page is pretty good and is one of the main stages. However there are a few things that need to be improved (in particular its gallery). {{User:Mr squid/Sig}} 19:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
#'''Slight support''' as well, the updates have gotten it up to par. I agree about the gallery though, it's still sort of limited. --<font face="Corbel">[[User:Bzeep|<font color="#f2992e"><i>Bzeep!</i></font>]] [[User talk:Bzeep|<small><font color="#f7c282">talk</font></small>]]</font> 02:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
#'''Slight support'''. The gallery still need some love to it but I think the article has improved. {{User:Shachar700/Sig}} 03:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I nominated it in the first place, and it's well-written and comprehensive. {{User:Nyargleblargle/Sig}} 17:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
====Oppose====
#<strike>'''Slight oppose''' in current state. Has a good amount of information, but it could use some cleanup, better wording, a more natural flow, and some updating with new stuff. The last major edit was in September! D: The associated gallery is a bit sparse as well. --<font face="Corbel">[[User:Bzeep|<font color="#f2992e"><i>Bzeep!</i></font>]] [[User talk:Bzeep|<small><font color="#f7c282">talk</font></small>]]</font> 19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)</strike>
#<strike>'''Oppose''' in current state. Lots of crowded text. outdated pic of camp for infobox and gallery and green particles at the gif in gallery. Not enough pictures for a big mode such as Turf War. {{User:Shachar700/Sig}} 19:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)</strike>
#<strike>'''Slight oppose''' Again, the pre-release image of Camp Triggerfish that was mentioned above. This could be misleading to newer players. I understand that it is from an official Nintendo commercial, but I believe (more) updated images would be better. [[User:Skylar|Skylar]] ([[User talk:Skylar|talk]]) 21:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)</strike>
====Comments====

Revision as of 08:00, 3 October 2016

RotM Icon ORCA.png
This page is an archive.
It contains older discussions that are no longer ongoing. If you wish to discuss one of the topics here, please bring it up on the current discussion page.

Squid Sisters

Nominated by Lukey140701

Support

  1. Support. It's complete without being too wordy and has a very appealing look to it, even if the gallery is getting a little big. --Bzeep! talk 19:39, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
  2. Support. The Squid Sisters are an important part of the game, and this page covers them very well. I don't think that the gallery is too big, and I personally like a lot of triva. And if people want to know more about either Callie or Marie, they each have their individual pages so that their group page isn't ridiculously big. Skylar (talk) 21:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
  3. Support I've been checking the article many times for reference and it has never failed to give me the proper information. I think the article is alright. Sometimes, lots of trivia and a big gallery don't mean an article is badly written. (sorry for my English.) Wiki icon.png Chivi-chivik (talk/edits) 10:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
  4. Support The Squid Sisters are one of the main characters in the game, and this page is very well done. User:Mr squid/Sig 14:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Weak oppose. The trivia section is extremely large and some of the page is written a bit unprofessionally. Nyargleblargle.pngNyargleblargle (Contribs) 17:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Easter Eggs

Nominated by Skylar

Support

Oppose

  1. Not a lot written on most of these. Nyargleblargle.pngNyargleblargle (Contribs) 01:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
  2. The page doesn't seem good enough to be a featured article, it needs more details! User:Mr squid/Sig 14:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  3. Gonna have to go with slight oppose as it is now. What is has isn't too bad, but it could be more in-depth and its formatting can be improved. --Bzeep! talk 02:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments

I just thought this would be interesting. They aren't glitches or hacks, but just fun things to do. I love how Nintendo adds little things like these to their games, these are what makes games awesome! Skylar (talk) 21:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Yeah! This can be a great article with some work. 👍 --Bzeep! talk 02:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Can I get rid of this nomination now? It was a while ago and now I see that its not really a good page... Skylar.png Skylar Talk Contribs 21:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)


Splatoon (manga)

Nominated by GogglesKunInkling

Support

  1. Strong Support. I'm a HUGE fan of the manga!!! GogglesKunInkling(Talk|Contribs) 11:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  2. Strong Support! I now think that is will be good on the front page as it is interesting and different from just normal Splatoon. Also the manga itself is awesome! Read it if you haven't already! User:Mr squid/Sig 13:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

Whatever you guys think it is, you admins are the Judd-ges! (get it?) GogglesKunInkling(Talk|Contribs) 11:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Slight oppose. I don't hate it, but the page needs to be improved for it to be on the main page. Plus, it's not even mentioned in Splatoon so, well it just can't be on there :( User:Mr squid/Sig 16:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

I have improved some! You should check it out or something. Second of all, you can read some of the manga. There will be proof that it can be mentioned in Splatoon. Come on, bra, let it be main! Fan of your Corocoro manga.... GogglesKunInkling! (talk)

  1. Oppose because of how new it is. It's definitely got potential! However, it needs a lot more info and the Rider page should probably be combined with it. --Bzeep! talk 02:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
  2. Strong oppose. Doesn't even discuss the plot. Nyargleblargle.pngNyargleblargle (Contribs) 02:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
    I Wow. Do you even read the "Plot" of Splatoon (manga)?
    That was added after I added my opinion. Still, I don't feel the article is very complete. Nyargleblargle.pngNyargleblargle (Contribs) 17:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  3. Oppose. It still needs a lot of work in various areas to be considered featured article-worthy. User:Lukey140701/Sig

Comments

The manga makes the world of Splatoon even more intresting. It uses the Splatoon rules and world, and all those things. Goggles is hilarious, but Knit Cap seems even more popular (I think it's due to the fact that her trait is Cutey). This manga is CoroCoro realated. Just wanna point it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GogglesKunInkling (talkcontribs)

Now that the article has been improved and expanded, and that I have read the manga, I think that it is definitely good enough to be on the front page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr squid (talkcontribs)