Inkipedia:Demotion/Archives/GuyPerfect

GuyPerfect (talk | contribs | logs) After a period of six months with no activity (last edit being February 10 of 2023), GuyPerfect has made no edits or any major contact to Inkipedia as a whole. Per demotion policy, I nominate for the demotion of Guy. Trig - 17:08, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Remove GuyPerfect's Administrator rights

(move to Autopatrolled)

Support

1. Arceusgjengen (talk) 17:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
2. User:Randomnamehere/Sig 18:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
3. FancyRat 18:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
4. EminenceTalk 03:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
5. GloverMist (talk) 16:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
6. OrderSquid38 [Talk] 18:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
7. Heddy (talk) 22:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
8. -Xando (talk) 12:26, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
9. Eli (talk) 13:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC) – I'd support keeping him as a Patroller (even if he remains inactive) due to his critical contributions in the past

Comments

While Guy has not been active in the content addition sphere, he is responsible for a large amount of changes to Inkipedia's skin and other CSS/JS elements. As far as I know he still remains willing to help in this sector should his help be needed, and so I think he should keep the interface admin rights. Luke26 (talk) 15:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

If he has not made changes to these pages since then, I do not anticipate there to be future edits. He is more than welcome to re-apply for the position should there be widespread changes to make, or he can contact an existing interface admin to make changes. Trig Jegman - 16:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

We should probably have a “Legacy Admin/Patroller” role. HockeyFleur29 (talk) 15:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Unnecessary. Staff who are no longer staff have no need for indication or rights. We (unusually) don't document former staff, so a list of those members may be nice. Nintendo Wiki has a weak list of former members, just could update that. Trig - 16:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

User was ostracized following the release of Splatoon 3, where their requests for assistance and collaboration went ignored just as they had been multiple times during the content cycle of Splatoon 2. Similarly, their input regarding a reorganization on Discord was not taken into consideration due to the fact that that decision was a hasty, emotioally-motivated foregone conclusion disguised by the facade of community engagement. The user's history of activity on Inkipedia is not relevant: if we valued their contributions, they would still be contributing and we wouldn't be having this conversation. There is little sense in putting something like this up for a vote, although that may be better than the alternative of envisioning a version of reality where decisions can be made without holding a vote. --GuyPerfect (talk) 17:47, 30 August 2023 (UTC)