User:Trig Jegman/Poll

Please indicate your interest in the idea of an independent fan content wiki. It would generally include page spaces dedicated to original characters, plotlines/roleplaying, gear sharing, design, and more—visually looking similar to Inkipedia. Please only vote with your name and keep all discussion to the discussion section.

Very interested

1. ArgentuTA164 (talk) 00:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
2. Ratch 01:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
3. Octoling E s3 (talk) 15:00, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Somewhat interested

1. FancyRat 22:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
2.  GX_64 (talk)  23:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Neutral

1. NEOSUIKA 23:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Not interested at all/I don't participate in Fanon Content

1. Yoshifan52 (talk) 20:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
2. Heddy (talk) 20:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
3. Walrus(talk)
4. Odd (Talk) 21:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
5. GloverMist (talk) 22:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
6. Eli (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

I would rather use the existing general Fanon Wiki

1. Ballistik57 (talk) 19:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

I don't participate in Fanon Content but I support a dedicated place for Splatoon Fanon Content

1. Heddy (talk) 21:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
2. Jelly Cat (talk) 21:31,25 February 2023

Discussion

Would it allow a large amount of images to be uploaded? I am somewhat interested in making comics (although I am not very good at drawing), and I am not sure if something like that would be allowed.  GX_64 (talk)  00:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes. In theory, as many as one wanted (in reason lol). Trig - 00:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Would the new site have some of the same templates as this one, such as those used for characters or Splatfest dialogues? ArgentuTA164 (talk) 04:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

If called for, sure. Trig - 05:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

It says "it will look visual similar to Inkipedia". My worry is that people will confuse the actual Inkipedia with this new site, and misinformation will spread to social media and Inkipedia self. It should look significantly different imo. So what does it mean with visual looking similar? Islar74 (talk) 09:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

It would use the same MediaWiki skin and rough layout. It would be very much branding wise and possibly colorwise distinct enough to be abundantly clearly that it's not the same site. This is because a lot of users do not like the relative design of the existing Fanon Wiki or are offput by its differences in some way—keeping it familiar on a dedicated site may make it more welcoming. Trig - 13:31, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

We don't need to be involved in this, and think it would actually be best if people were encouraged to do this for themselves in fully independent and decentralized ways. Break free of those platform-capitalist "I can only use specific websites that already exist" chains! Making your own things with complete creativity and freedom is still a thing that's possible on the internet in 2023 (thank god), and there are a lot of resources to help you do it! And you'll learn a ton too! Go make a page/site on Neocities, or Glitch, or GitHub Pages, or – hell – a Neopets Petpet page if you really want to be I'm-totally-not-a-zoomer-I-promise-look-how-amusingly-retro-this-is about it! These things are possible! (I already expressed this stuff informally via Discord but putting it here for the sake of transparency & not having discussions on + about the internet behind the walls of non-indexable 3rd party private chatrooms.) –Eli (talk) 15:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)