Inkipedia talk:Policy/User content

From Inkipedia, the Splatoon wiki
< Inkipedia talk:Policy
Revision as of 02:34, 19 February 2023 by Kirbeat (talk | contribs) (→‎Comments: New comments should go below, and replies like this.)

This is a vote for the user content policy. If the vote is successful, the policy will be passed.

This policy proposal was created by Trig Jegman. For more details, see Trig's original post.

Voting will last 2 weeks, but will automatically be extended to 4 weeks if there is a tie, or if there is clearly not a consensus.

Support

  1. Support With these guidelines user content will become more organized. It will also help direct users to editing Inkipedia’s mainspace articles. Odd S2 Splatfest Icon McNuggets.png (Talk) 00:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support I 100% agree with this. It feels like half of the images at this point are just user images.DaRootBeer1231 (talk) 00:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3.  GX_64 (talk)  01:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Support Yoshifan52 (talk) 01:18, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  5. Considering I wrote the thing, I'd hope that I would vote for it. I think this is the greatest compromise between freedom of some user content while not losing focus as to what the site is about: Documenting the Splatoon franchise in an encyclopedia/wiki format. Trig - 01:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  6. Setting a limit on these things prevents people from treating this wiki as a place to dump fanon when it just isn't a place for that. Seeing as the 5 subpage limit only takes into account fanon pages, not pages made as drafts of mainspace or so, it seems pretty generous to me. And I don't know how most users like to upload personal images, but 7 doesn't seem to me as a low limit, though making it a bit higher in a fanon heavy wiki like this may not do too much damage. Kirbeat (talk) 01:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  7. Support Inkipedia is not meant to be a site focused on fan content. Lately it seems like a lot of images are being uploaded for personal use, and a handful of them do not seem to be in use at all. Limiting the amount of user images will help keep things tidy and focused on the site's intended purpose. S3 Badge Nautilus 47 5.pngFancyRatCredits - Inkling Boy Eating Popsicle.png 01:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  8. Strong support. Inkipedia staff, including me, have spent significant time moderating personal user content that was uploaded to the wiki. This time would be better spent moderating actual contributions to Inkipedia. For user content, such as art and stories, we have the Inkipedia Discord, with its own fantastic team of moderators that are actually skilled at moderating that type of content. So please, let's pass this policy to encourage submitting the right content in the right places! Heddy (talk) 01:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  9. Support Islar74 (talk) 01:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  10. Support. I do feel that this policy will keep the focus and main goals of Inkipedia in the headlight— of not only our wonderful staff who moderate it— but the equally wonderful editors who support it. To add some comment on points I’ve seen in other votes: I think 5 userpages is a great middle ground. The thought of more does seem reasonable to me, though perhaps with some specific criteria for editors? As for user images, I don’t really have a lot knowledge here. While I can see, again, reasonable concern for more. I don’t think the scope that would bring is necessarily within the scope of the wiki. Again, I don’t want to overstep myself, so I’d aprreciate if someone else could add comment on this section of the policy specifically to make sure we have a true consensus on all parts of the policy. AwildmuskS3 Weapon Main .52 Gal.png(Hablo español?) 02:07, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  11. Support I think this is a good decision, and support the idea of making the wiki a more “Hey I’m going to look this up” rather than “this is my personal account that is chock full of personal information.” File:S3 Tableturf Card Toni Kensa.pngℂ𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕖𝕥.𝕠𝕔𝕥𝕠 File:S3 Tableturf Card Annaki.png (ℙ𝕣𝕒𝕥𝕥𝕝𝕖) 02:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose

  1. Oppose: I still agree, but maybe increase the limit if you have experience? Maybe add 5 more each month to each Inkipedia user and add 10 more when you get better user rights. The limit should be less images for less experienced people. Maybe that could help? KPOfficial26 (talk) 01:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. I also oppose. I feel like putting restrictions would make people not want to edit the wiki more. That's what I feel like is happening with bulbapedia. I also think user pages can help new users get familiar with the wiki. YOLO2020 S2 Icon Agent 3.png 01:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    User pages and images would still be allowed, including user sandbox pages (which exist to encourage testing and experimentation). All that's being proposed is a hard limit on the amount of such pages and personal images, as there is currently no limit to either. Yoshifan52 (talk) 01:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    To add to this: Pages that are for learning the wiki or building content for the wiki are fine. They are not included in the limit of five. The five userpages are explicitly for fanon or otherwise not-site-related material. Trig - 01:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. I oppose as well. I fully agree with the point YOLO2020 made. If we put this policy in place, it may deter new users from editing the wiki. WolfTamer File:S3 Icon Callie.png 02:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Discouraging policy. Shahar (talk) 02:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comments

  • I mostly support this, but maybe it could be upped to 10 files instead of 7? ArgentuTA164 (talk) 01:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @ArgentuTA164: In the discussion that led to this proposal, some Inkipedians wanted it to be 10, and most wanted it to be 5, so 7 was chosen as a compromise. Personally, I can't think of an example where someone needed to have 10 personal images on a user page, as that amount of personal content is better suited to a blog like Tumblr or Twitter. Inkipedia simply does not have the resources to moderate people using it like a social media site, and even if we did have the resources, such usage would hinder the goal of Inkipedia: to build the best Splatoon wiki! Heddy (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • @User:Heddy; If this policy does come to pass, would I have to completely remove my Sandboxes' content to comply with it? As my Fan-Fic is my prized passion project. If so, I would like some people to offer advice on to making a site for it that I can freely edit/update it and put a link to it on my user page, but I want it to be only viewed by the wiki's viewers/users. I'm open to any suggestions. Also, we have to consider Minifest images as well, so maybe 10 files can be the limit instead. Sincerely, P.J. GT(talk)SSBU Inkling Boy.png 01:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @User:P.J. GT You can keep your pages, as long as the subpage limit of 5 is not exceeded. Any pages that are drafts for Inkipedia articles don't count towards the limit.
    If you decide to move the content elsewhere, you could try using Tumblr and using the private/password-protected option if you don't want the general public to see the content. Maybe other people will have other suggestions for other websites to try.
    Minifests do not count towards limits because they are not personal; they are considered a "project", many people participate in them, and the main community page is in the "Inkipedia" namespace. Heddy (talk) 01:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @User:P.J. GT I am seeing your sandboxes and I think that they don't fall into this limit at all, as they are 3 out of 5 and they have zero personal images. Though if they were, the thing is that Inkipedia isn't a place for fanon content like that, Fan-Fics like those aren't made to be hosted here, but in other sites. I don't know if there is some way so that only people from here can view content from other sites, aside from manually accepting each user one-by-one I guess, but your sandboxes are already public; they can already be seen by whoever going to your userpage, even if they don't have an account in this wiki. Kirbeat (talk) 01:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • To cover several comments at once: Seven was chosen as a middle ground of five and ten: The logic being two images for each splatoon game (Your inkling, your gear etc) and a seventh "fun" image. Most users don't even have seven images. In regards to PJ, may I encourage Fanon Wiki? They have a dedicated Splatoon namespace that could be used. Additionally, you did not come up in my list of people with 5 or greater user pages, which means it would not be an issue if you kept the literal number of pages low. Trig - 01:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Question, how do Inkfests not count as social activities? The Inkipedia is to inform, correct? Aren't Inkfests for entertainment purposes? This was probably answered somewhere, but I can't find the answer right now. HatedS3 Badge E-liter 4K 5.png 02:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Mosthated That is considered a community project, listed in the sidebar / navigation menu. The proposed policy doesn't forbid "social" stuff, it only forbids "personal" images and pages submitted only for your own personal use that are not intended to improve wiki articles. Heddy (talk) 02:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I understand what you mean... but how do Inkfests improve wiki articles?HatedS3 Badge E-liter 4K 5.png 02:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Retrieved from "https://splatoonwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Inkipedia_talk:Policy/User_content&oldid=355704"